Today, Extra TV showed off Britney Spears' latest magazine cover for the December issue of "Lucky" magazine. Check it out below:
Not with that overly photoshopped hairline. It's not Cosmo 2010 bad....but it could have been a lot better.
Now, isn't this so much better? #FreeBritneysForehead
Supposedly there's a video out there from Extra that shows a few pics from the photoshoot so I'll throw that in this post once we get it later tonight.
EDIT: Another pic from the shoot...
EDIT: Another pic from the shoot...
These are so bad! Her face looks so strand and uncomfortable in the cover pic and the extra pic. The pic and feathered outfit in the extra pic is wayyy to young for her and dated. Looks like it came out of her early 2000s wardrobe. Such a shame lately she has been looking great!
ReplyDeleteAgreed. I blame the magazine more than Britney though. Overall Lucky magazine does this with most of their cover models. Xtina's cover last month was a hot ass mess too: http://i.huffpost.com/gen/758664/thumbs/o-CHRISTINA-AGUILERA-LUCKY-COVER-570.jpg?2
Deletei wouldnt say unconfortable, but she doesnt look like her... at all!
ReplyDeleteAt least in the magazine cover, the other one looks just like it was taken from the she was with Candies...
UGLY
ReplyDelete