Yes or No: Rihanna for Playboy?

 

We've heard Rih's turned down Playboy before, but how will she respond to the alleged negotiations Hugh Hefner is throwing at her? Apparently the offer starts at over a million for Rihanna to do something we've seen her do like 100 times already. 

Check out the article from MTV.

Rihanna has allegedly been offered over £1million to pose naked for Playboy.

According to The Daily Star, Playboy founder Hugh Hefner is keen for RiRi to shed her clothes for his iconic publication and is said to have made the 24-year old a secret offer to land a sexy shoot with the S&M singer. It is thought the Bajan babe is interested in posing nude for the mag, but is concerned how her fans will react.

A US source told the tabloid: "Rihanna and Hef are in top secret discussions at the moment. He sees Rihanna as the best music star to have on the cover.

“She is at the top of her game – beautiful, sexy and with huge international appeal. Playboy is not a sleazy porn magazine either, and allows the stars to get nude in a classy and sophisticated way.That aspect appeals to Rihanna’s creative side."

“Rihanna has got naked many times before and is very self-assured about her body. In the past she has been snapped topless and not been paid for it. Here she would be earning more than a million for exactly the same thing.”

The source added that RiRi is expected to sign up in the near future, with Hefner convinced her issue will be a best-seller due to the We Found Love hitmaker's worldwide success

Now, I'm all for some official nudes from Rihanna, but do we think Playboy is a little classless or are we still passing it off as "art." That wide spread shoot Aubrey O'Day did was sure as raunchy as it wanted to be, but Lindsay Lohan surprised us by actually not looking like a complete whore.

Should Rihanna do the Playboy spread and really confirm her "bad girl" status?